Dysmenorrhoea after endometrial ablation - query bank

Question: Can failed (i.e. periods still heavy) new generation endometrial ablation procedures (e.g. Menotreat) cause significant new dysmenorrhoea that didn't exist before?




Help us improve clinical query answers - just fill in a survey after reading this page




Please note: the search for this response was carried out over 1 year ago. Eligible users may request an update of the evidence by submitting a new Clinical Query here.

Answer:

No evidence was found of dysmenorrhoea arising after second generation endometrial ablation procedures.

A Cochrane review of endometrial destruction techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding (1) found that:

“Regarding complications, women undergoing second generation ablation were less likely to have fluid overload, perforation, cervical lacerations and hematometra as a result of their surgery than women undergoing first generation ablation (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.5; OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.7; OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.3; OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.7, respectively). They were more likely to have nausea and vomiting and uterine cramping (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.4; OR =1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.9).

There were no significant differences in satisfaction rates between the two groups at one, three and five-years follow up, except for satisfaction two years after ablation in favour of second generation techniques (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.3).

There were no significant differences for the other outcomes compared: inability to work, amenorrhoea rates, other complication rates and requirement for any additional surgery or hysterectomy.”

(Evidence level 1a)

Reference:

  1. Lethaby A, Hickey M, Garry R. Endometrial destruction techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001501. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001501.pub2. Abstract (and full text in some countries).  Full text available to Fellows, Members and Trainees.

 

 Search date: March 2009

Classification of evidence levels

Ia Evidence obtained from meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Ib Evidence obtained from at least one randomised controlled trial.

IIa Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed controlled study without randomisation.

IIb Evidence obtained from at least one other type of well-designed quasi-experimental study.

III Evidence obtained from well-designed non-experimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies and case studies.

IV Evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experience of respected authorities.

This clinical query answer was produced following the clinical query protocol as described here.

The RCOG will not be liable for any special or consequential damages arising from the use or reliance on information contained within the Query Bank.

Date published: 03/03/2009

main menu